fix: name the allowed-paths action for what it adds, a path or a file

"Add folder or path" promised one thing and offered another: the listing is
folders only, because the Host's browse primitive has no file rows, while the
extras legitimately name files — `../../CONTROLLER.md` is the example the panel
itself gives.

The action is "Add path or file", its field is "Path or file", and the hint says
which of the two the list can show and how the other one is added. Nothing about
the interaction moved; the copy was the part that was wrong.
This commit is contained in:
NotExpectedYet committed 2026-09-27 07:31:50 +01:00
1 parent 6b92656ed2
commit b0902017fd
3 files changed
+54 -7

No files matched your search

+2 -1
View File
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ a breadcrumb trail, a hidden-entries toggle — driven through
stored in the form that keeps its meaning: `/work/root/src/shared` becomes
`src/shared` when the session started in `/work/root`. The picker's own path field
stays editable, because the Host lists folders and an extra may legitimately name
a file.
a file — which is why that action reads **Add path or file** and its field **Path
or file**, rather than promising a folder the list would then fail to show.
Because the panel owns widening, `facet action=add` is the *other* path and the
narrower one: it is gated on an approval channel, and a deployment with none — the