feat(adb_command): selectable target, strict resolution, and a real response (t14)
The user's live run could not select his Shield for
nvidia_shield.adb_command, so he ran his diagnostics through the deprecated
androidtv integration instead. Measured against the installed HA (2026.10.1),
the cause is a contract, not a bug in the handler:
* ServiceRegistry.async_register has NO target parameter, so a target cannot be
declared at registration;
* the frontend renders the target picker from the service DESCRIPTION, which
HA builds from services.yaml or from the runtime async_set_service_schema —
and the runtime description WINS.
So async_setup now registers with supports_response=OPTIONAL and publishes
ADB_COMMAND_SERVICE_DESCRIPTION (target: {entity: [{domain: media_player}]},
fields, prose mirrored in strings.json/translations/en.json and pinned against
both by a test). No services.yaml is needed, and none is added.
The target resolution is strict, because the failure mode of guessing is a raw
shell command on the wrong device: exactly one PARTICIPANT, told apart as
no_target (nothing selected), unsupported_target (not a participant / option
off / another integration's entity) and ambiguous_target (two selected — sent
to neither). Accepts what HA actually sends: entity_id as text or as the LIST a
picked target produces, and device_id (an automation targeting the DEVICE),
expanded only through this integration's own registry entries and only to media
players. The output now comes back in the response under adb_response — the key
the user's captures read — while an unreachable Shield stays adb_unavailable,
an error rather than an empty response, and a call that does not ask for a
response is unchanged.
Evidence: 12 real-HA tests (new tests/test_adb_command_real_ha.py) drive the
real service registry, the real get_services websocket payload (the exact JSON
bytes the browser parses: target present, response optional, both fields) and
real async_call for every shape above. t14's CI gate globs tests/test_*real_ha.py
so a new real-HA file cannot skip silently; the skip/empty-collection guards stay
and were executed. The real-HA probe also caught async_entries_for_device being
a MODULE-LEVEL helper (not a registry method) that the stub had hidden, so the
drift gate's owner map now covers async_register, async_set_service_schema and
async_entries_for_device, with the call-argument floor raised 44 -> 52.
Verify: suites 681/4 and 682/3; real-HA 38 + the new file 12 (50 with the glob);
ruff clean; drift exit 0 (54 call arguments).
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
8a4e72b80a
commit
6aa3b6bfdd
13 files changed
+1087
-56
No files matched your search
+7
-1
@@ -79,14 +79,20 @@ class _SeedHass(SimpleNamespace):
|
||||
config_entries = _SeedEntriesStub()
|
||||
config_entries.updating_entry_calls = []
|
||||
self._services = {("nvidia_shield", "adb_command"): None}
|
||||
#: t14: per-service response support the registration declared.
|
||||
self.response_support: dict[tuple, object] = {}
|
||||
super().__init__(
|
||||
config_entries=config_entries,
|
||||
scheduled_tasks=[],
|
||||
services=self,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def async_register(self, domain, service, func, schema=None):
|
||||
def async_register(
|
||||
self, domain, service, func, schema=None, supports_response=None
|
||||
):
|
||||
self._services[(domain, service)] = (func, schema)
|
||||
#: t14: HA is told whether the action answers with a response.
|
||||
self.response_support[(domain, service)] = supports_response
|
||||
|
||||
def has_service(self, domain, service):
|
||||
return (domain, service) in self._services
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user