The user's live run could not select his Shield for
nvidia_shield.adb_command, so he ran his diagnostics through the deprecated
androidtv integration instead. Measured against the installed HA (2026.10.1),
the cause is a contract, not a bug in the handler:
* ServiceRegistry.async_register has NO target parameter, so a target cannot be
declared at registration;
* the frontend renders the target picker from the service DESCRIPTION, which
HA builds from services.yaml or from the runtime async_set_service_schema —
and the runtime description WINS.
So async_setup now registers with supports_response=OPTIONAL and publishes
ADB_COMMAND_SERVICE_DESCRIPTION (target: {entity: [{domain: media_player}]},
fields, prose mirrored in strings.json/translations/en.json and pinned against
both by a test). No services.yaml is needed, and none is added.
The target resolution is strict, because the failure mode of guessing is a raw
shell command on the wrong device: exactly one PARTICIPANT, told apart as
no_target (nothing selected), unsupported_target (not a participant / option
off / another integration's entity) and ambiguous_target (two selected — sent
to neither). Accepts what HA actually sends: entity_id as text or as the LIST a
picked target produces, and device_id (an automation targeting the DEVICE),
expanded only through this integration's own registry entries and only to media
players. The output now comes back in the response under adb_response — the key
the user's captures read — while an unreachable Shield stays adb_unavailable,
an error rather than an empty response, and a call that does not ask for a
response is unchanged.
Evidence: 12 real-HA tests (new tests/test_adb_command_real_ha.py) drive the
real service registry, the real get_services websocket payload (the exact JSON
bytes the browser parses: target present, response optional, both fields) and
real async_call for every shape above. t14's CI gate globs tests/test_*real_ha.py
so a new real-HA file cannot skip silently; the skip/empty-collection guards stay
and were executed. The real-HA probe also caught async_entries_for_device being
a MODULE-LEVEL helper (not a registry method) that the stub had hidden, so the
drift gate's owner map now covers async_register, async_set_service_schema and
async_entries_for_device, with the call-argument floor raised 44 -> 52.
Verify: suites 681/4 and 682/3; real-HA 38 + the new file 12 (50 with the glob);
ruff clean; drift exit 0 (54 call arguments).
tests/test_config_flow_real_ha.py skips itself at import time when homeassistant is
absent, and a skipped file is indistinguishable from a passing one: the stub jobs
end in "N passed, 1 skipped" and exit 0, and the drift sweep never reads it. That is
how three real-HA-only facts stayed hidden while five gates were green.
New real-ha-config-flow job installs the real stack on Home Assistant's interpreter
floor (reusing HOMEASSISTANT_PYTHON_FLOOR from tests/ha_api_drift.py), runs the file
with -rs, and then checks the pytest summary line itself: it must report passed tests
and no skipped/failed/error line, because some pytest versions exit 0 for a file that
skipped itself. The header comment now names both jobs that install Home Assistant.
t45's review of the release versioning found three lows; two touch behaviour here (the
third, README wording, is the next commit).
R1 — with a write-back the tag points at the bot's own commit, so the notes range
`PREV..TAG` published "- chore(release): vX [skip ci]" as the first line of every
release. The range now ends at `${TAG}^` when BUMP=yes (the last commit a developer
wrote) and at `${TAG}` when it is not (there the tag IS the pushed commit, and it
belongs in the notes). `git describe` for the previous tag is unchanged: it already
started from `${TAG}^`, so it keeps naming the previous release.
R3 — the job guard matched the `[skip ci]` marker ANYWHERE in the commit message, so a
developer commit whose body merely mentioned it silently skipped its own release. The
guard is now anchored to the release commit's subject prefix
(`!startsWith(message, 'chore(release):')`), which is a structural property, not a
substring a body can trip. The marker stays in the commit message: it is the
convention Gitea itself may honour to skip the run outright, and the README now says
so, together with the fact that the job guard is the layer that holds when it does not.
3c — the resolver's tests used tag fixtures, so `refs/tags/X^{commit}` was never
exercised, and that dereference is the entire reason an annotated tag is recognised
(for one, `git rev-parse refs/tags/X` is the TAG OBJECT, not the commit, so a
comparison that forgot to dereference would miss a released commit). The resolver now
also runs inside real temporary repositories built with real annotated and lightweight
tags: released-on-HEAD both ways, a tag on an older commit falling back to the date,
no tags at all, the same-day scan walking real tags, and gap reuse. The workflow's own
run: scripts are executed too — extracted from the YAML by hand rather than with a
parser the fast suite does not have — covering the bump/verify/tag path (commit
subject, tag == HEAD, the tag's manifest, the pushed tag), the inconsistent-manifest
refusal, the rejected-push failure, and the notes range: with BUMP=yes the fixed range
yields "- feat: the real change" while the range it replaced demonstrably contains
"- chore(release):". The job-level `if:` itself cannot be executed here (no Gitea
runner) and stays a contract pin; the script-side layer that makes a bypassed guard
harmless is executed instead.
Verified: 414 passed / 2 skipped, ruff clean, release.yml parses.
The evidence this fixes: v2026.10.09 was published while master's manifest still
read 2026.10.08, so HACS compared every install against a version that never
moved and offered nobody that update. A second release in the same UTC day was
also a silent no-op: the date tag already existed, the run resolved to the same
version again, and it stopped at "already tagged".
* scripts/determine-release-version.sh owns the decision, so it is tested rather
than hoped for: the manifest version while it is untagged (bump it to force a
release); else today's UTC date; else YYYY.MM.DD.N with the LOWEST untagged
N >= 2 (a gap is reused, not burned). An already-released commit, and any
version whose tag exists, are an explicit RELEASE=no instead of a failure. The
script only ever reads the clock with `date -u`, and it emits
VERSION/TAG/SOURCE/BUMP/RELEASE on stdout and into $GITHUB_OUTPUT.
* the workflow writes the resolved version into the manifest whenever it differs,
commits it as "chore(release): v<VERSION> [skip ci]" with the existing bot
identity, pushes HEAD:master, and only then tags THAT commit — so the artifact,
its tag and the default branch agree. A branch-protection rejection fails the
job with an instruction to bump the manifest manually; nothing is tagged first.
* post-push verification reads the manifest out of origin/master (the copy HACS
fetches) and refuses to publish when it does not equal the released version.
* no self-trigger loop: the conventional [skip ci] marker on the bot commit plus a
job-level `if:` that re-checks github.event.head_commit.message. The guard is the
load-bearing part — it holds even where a Gitea version ignores the marker.
* preserved: manifest-wins precedence, the concurrency group without
cancel-in-progress, notes from the commit range, zip asset upload and the
409-tolerant publish path. RELEASE=no replaces the old `exists` output, so an
already-tagged version still ends as a clean no-op.
Also fixes the data: master's manifest moves 2026.10.08 -> 2026.10.09, the latest
released tag, so the repo stops contradicting its own releases immediately rather
than only after the next successful run (which resolves to v2026.10.11 either way).
tests/test_release_versioning.py drives all of it: the four scenarios, the
lowest-free-suffix rule, UTC determinism under three timezones, the error paths,
the $GITHUB_OUTPUT handoff, and the workflow's own contract — textual, because the
fast suite has no YAML parser; the verify command parses the file with pyyaml.
Verified: 356 passed / 2 skipped, 357 / 1 with androidtvremote2, ruff clean,
release.yml valid, `bash -n` clean, and the script resolves the real repo to
v2026.10.11 (date, bump=yes). The workflow itself cannot run here (no Gitea
runner): its run: steps were extracted from the YAML and executed against scratch
repos with a bare origin, covering the bump+verify+tag path (commit subject, tag
target and tag manifest all agree), the inconsistent-manifest failure and the
rejected-push failure.
t38 found two holes in the drift gate itself.
F2 — the job could never run where it mattered. Home Assistant 2026.10.1
declares ``Requires-Python >=3.14.2`` (PyPI metadata), so the old guard let a
3.13 runner through and the ``homeassistant>=2026.10`` install then failed with
a resolver error. The job now provisions its own interpreter
(``actions/setup-python@v5`` with ``python-version: "3.14"``) and the guard runs
against the REAL floor, read from ``ha_api_drift.HOMEASSISTANT_PYTHON_FLOOR`` —
one source of truth, pinned by a test against the installed distribution's own
``Requires-Python`` metadata. Verified: on 3.13.16 the guard refuses with
"Home Assistant needs Python >= 3.14.2, but this job runs 3.13.16 / Fix: raise
actions/setup-python…"; on 3.14.8 it reports "interpreter ok"; and
``uvx --python 3.14 --with 'homeassistant>=2026.10'`` resolves 2026.10.1.
F1 — the standalone entry point was a false green. It printed counters and
exited 0 even when it had walked nothing, which is exactly how the manual
red-proof tool gets misused. The non-vacuity floors now live in
``ha_api_drift.FLOORS`` and are enforced in ONE place, ``Report.floor_violations()``,
used by the pytest wrapper and by ``__main__`` (so the constants cannot drift
apart; a test asserts the wrapper holds no floor-like constants of its own).
On top of that the sweep can no longer lie in either direction:
* an empty or mis-targeted directory reports ``FLOOR:`` lines and
``drift sweep FAILED`` and exits 1 (a non-existent path is a ``bad-path``
finding, not a traceback and not a silent zero-module sweep);
* with no homeassistant installed it returns a single ``no-homeassistant``
finding with zero counters — never a wall of phantom "broken-import"s, never
a green exit.
Verified in the CI-equivalent environment (Python 3.14.8 + homeassistant
2026.10.1): HEAD exits 0 with "no Home-Assistant API drift (13 modules, 60
imports, 35 call arguments, 7 awaited HA calls)"; the empty directory exits 1
with 4 FLOOR lines and no findings; a missing path exits 1 with the ``bad-path``
finding; and the full pre-fix tree (``git archive 5ede4fe``) exits 1 with
exactly the three t36 drifts (media_player.py:965 BrowseMediaSource,
diagnostics.py:93 homeassistant.util.diagnostic, config_flow.py:425
missing-await) and 0 floor violations.
The fast ``test`` job and ``release.yml`` are untouched; the workflow is
unchanged in shape except the new provisioning + guard steps, and parses as
valid YAML.
The unit suite validates production modules against hand-written stubs, so a
call site that no longer matches real Home Assistant stays green — that is how
D1, D2 and D3 reached master. This adds the check that would have caught them.
`tests/ha_api_drift.py` (stdlib-only, documented inline) parses every module of
custom_components/nvidia_shield and resolves each Home-Assistant dependency
against an INSTALLED homeassistant:
1. every `homeassistant.*` import — module present, attribute present (or a
submodule of that name exists, which is what `from package import submodule`
means) — catches D1/D2 and any future move;
2. every keyword argument passed to a known HA API (HA_CALL_OWNERS: the
ConfigFlow/ConfigEntries APIs we call) must exist in the real signature —
catches the `options_updates` class of bug;
3. every `self.<method>()` call in a class that inherits from an HA class is
compared with the real definition: a coroutine must be awaited and an
awaited call must be a coroutine — catches D3.
`tests/test_ha_api_drift.py` runs it against the production tree, asserts the
sweep is not vacuous (module/import/argument/await counters), and pins the red
proof with the four pre-fix forms, plus the green proof for the fixed forms. It
skips cleanly when homeassistant is absent, so the stdlib-only jobs are
unaffected.
`.gitea/workflows/test.yml` gains the `ha-api-drift` job — the one place Home
Assistant is installed — guarded by an explicit Python >= 3.13 check (Home
Assistant 2026.x requires it) and the same PEP 668 retry the test job uses.
Red proof against the real pre-fix revisions (svn-style checkout of
`git show HEAD:…` into a temp dir, and the pre-t35 config_flow.py for the kwarg):
media_player.py:965: broken-import: from homeassistant.components.media_player
import BrowseMediaSource: …BrowseMediaSource does not exist
diagnostics.py:93: broken-import: from homeassistant.util.diagnostic import
async_redact_data: module 'homeassistant.util.diagnostic' is not importable
config_flow.py:425: missing-await: self._async_handle_discovery_without_unique_id()
is a coroutine on homeassistant.config_entries.ConfigFlow
config_flow.py:700: unknown-kwarg: async_update_reload_and_abort() has no
'options_updates' parameter (exit 1 on that tree, exit 0 on this one)
Verified: variant 1 289 passed / 2 skipped; variant 2 (androidtvremote2) 290
passed / 1 skipped; ruff clean; `UV_PYTHON=3.13 uvx --with homeassistant --with
pytest-asyncio pytest tests/test_ha_api_drift.py -q` → 4 passed (the bare form of
that command needs the pin here only because this sandbox's default Python is
3.15 and pycares has no wheel for it / no CMake to build it; CI pins the
interpreter explicitly).
James Mackay